In ancillary 1, I wrote about Martial Discord: Why Prop 8 Won. This article was originally written by Richard Kim in The Nation. It appears that Mr. Kim's most affective strategy was his use of punctuation in communicating to his audience. My plan is to focus on the exact same strategy as my primary source of information. The reason I chose this particular article was because it was the most intriguing to me. I like to seek and learn of truths that have been twisted or covered up. Though I consider myself a novice reader I get the sense that this is a powerful article by Richard Kim. I don't have any questions about the analytical process or identifying strategies. I'm convinced that it takes desire, practice, and a mental toughness to get through it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi dcosby,
ReplyDeleteYou write, " It appears that Mr. Kim's most affective strategy was his use of punctuation in communicating to his audience." I'm intrigued, as punctuation is an excellent, often very effective strategy, but it's usually not the first noticed or highlighted. Yet you say you will focus on this strategy. The only thing missing here is the why -- what sort of punctuation does Kim use? What does it do, rhetorically? and so forth .. .